Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tekota
Multireels
66.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio6.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight410g / 14.46oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €170.90
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500 HGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 12/440

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
75.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €198.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX offers a durability of 8.57 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.1:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tekota and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX
- A score of 6.43 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) gives a decent speed but doess not rush a lot
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX
