Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tekota
Multireels
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio6.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €170.90
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500 HGA LCM
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 12/440

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €199.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X clearly outshines Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (4.9:1) and ball bearings (8). While Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Tekota and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX
- Scoring 8.57 out of 10 (430g / 15,17oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
