Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tekota
Multireels
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio6.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €170.90
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500 HGA LCM
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 12/440

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
59.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.62 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight380g / 13.4oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €74.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 SS-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX offers a durability of 8.57 out of 10, while Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX stands out for a gear ratio of 4.9:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tekota and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT?
Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX
- Scoring 8.57 out of 10 (430g / 15,17oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX
