Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tekota
Multireels
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio6.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €170.90
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500 HGA LCM
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 12/440

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX edges out Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.1:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch and a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Tekota and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX
- A score of 6.43 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) gives a decent speed but doess not rush a lot
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Delphin HORNET 30X
