Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tekota
Multireels
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio6.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €170.90
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500 HGA LCM
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 12/440

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
49.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.05/200
Conclusion
Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.57 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch). While Daiwa RX LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Tekota and Daiwa RX LT?
Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX
- A score of 6.43 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) gives a decent speed but doess not rush a lot
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa RX LT 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
