Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tekota
Multireels
66.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio6.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight410g / 14.46oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €170.90
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size501 HGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 12/440

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X edges out Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.1:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.57 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Tekota and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX
- A score of 6.43 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) gives a decent speed but doess not rush a lot
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
