Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tekota
Multireels
66.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio6.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €177.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size600 HGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 16/390

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x edges out Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.2:1) and the total score (8.6 out of 10). Still, Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a line retrieve per crank of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Tekota and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX
- A score of 6.43 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) gives a decent speed but doess not rush a lot
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX
