Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tekota
Multireels
66.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio6.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €177.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size600 HGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 16/390

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
59.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.62 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight380g / 13.4oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €74.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 SS-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX offers a durability of 8.59 out of 10, while Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX stands out for a gear ratio of 4.9:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tekota and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT?
Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX
- Scoring 8.57 out of 10 (430g / 15,17oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX
