Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tekota
Multireels
66.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio6.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €177.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size600 HGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 16/390

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.59 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Tekota and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX
- A score of 6.43 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) gives a decent speed but doess not rush a lot
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX
