Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tekota
Multireels
66.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio6.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €177.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size600 HGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 16/390

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.59 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Tekota and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX
- A score of 6.43 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) gives a decent speed but doess not rush a lot
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R
