Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tekota
Multireels
66.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio6.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €177.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size600 HGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 16/390

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
85.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000FE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX edges out Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.1:1) and the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs). Still, Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a durability of 8.59 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Tekota and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
