Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tekota
Multireels
66.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio6.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight450g / 15.87oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €177.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size600 HGA LCM
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 12/440

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €199.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X clearly outshines Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (4.9:1) and ball bearings (8). While Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Tekota and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (450g / 15,87oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
