Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tekota
Multireels
66.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio6.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight450g / 15.87oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €177.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size600 HGA LCM
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 12/440

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X edges out Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.1:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.59 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Tekota and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX
- A score of 6.43 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) gives a decent speed but doess not rush a lot
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X
