Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
89.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1 / 1:1
Maximum drag40kg / 88.18lbs
Weight4935g / 174.08oz
Line retireve per crank98 centimeter / 38.58 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,099.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size130A
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Shimano Tiagra 130AX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 175g / 6,17oz and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Tiagra and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano Tiagra 130AX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.2 out of 10 (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX
