Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
89.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1 / 1:1
Maximum drag40kg / 88.18lbs
Weight4935g / 174.08oz
Line retireve per crank98 centimeter / 38.58 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,099.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size130A
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Delphin IXTREK
Spinning
60.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.9 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight254g / 8.96oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €43.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/360
Conclusion
Shimano Tiagra 130AX clearly outshines Delphin IXTREK 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (40kg / 88,18lbs) and line retrieve per crank (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch). While Delphin IXTREK 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Tiagra 130AX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Tiagra and Delphin IXTREK?
Shimano Tiagra 130AX
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (40kg / 88,18lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.2 out of 10 (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Delphin IXTREK 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.31 out of 10 (254g / 8,96oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
