Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
89.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1 / 1:1
Maximum drag40kg / 88.18lbs
Weight4935g / 174.08oz
Line retireve per crank98 centimeter / 38.58 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,099.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size130A
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120
Conclusion
Shimano Tiagra 130AX edges out Shimano AERO XR C5000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch). Still, Shimano AERO XR C5000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 250g / 8,82oz and a gear ratio of 4.7, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Tiagra and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano Tiagra 130AX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Delphin RAYA body


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Delphin RAYA body
