Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
82.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight2365g / 83.42oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €633.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50A
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tiagra 50AX and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tiagra 50AX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.8:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tiagra and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Shimano Tiagra 50AX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX
