Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
82.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight2365g / 83.42oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €633.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50A
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
63.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Tiagra 50AX edges out Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.29 out of 10). Still, Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a weight of 260g / 9,17oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Tiagra and Shimano Catana FE?
Shimano Tiagra 50AX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX
