Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
86.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1 / 1.3:1
Maximum drag17kg / 37.48lbs
Weight2447g / 86.32oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €633.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50WA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tiagra 50WAX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tiagra 50WAX offers a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX stands out for a weight of 175g / 6,17oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tiagra and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Tiagra 50WAX
- Scoring 8.93 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX
