Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
86.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1 / 1.3:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight2445g / 86.25oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €633.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50WLRSA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX offers a line retrieve per crank of 93 centimeter / 36.61 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX stands out for a weight of 175g / 6,17oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tiagra and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX
- Scoring 8.87 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX
