Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
86.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1 / 1.3:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight2445g / 86.25oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €633.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50WLRSA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX and Shimano AERO XR C5000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano AERO XR C5000X stands out for a weight of 250g / 8,82oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tiagra and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Delphin RAYA body vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
