Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
85.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.5:1 / 1.3:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight3265g / 115.17oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €779.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80WA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tiagra 80WAX and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tiagra 80WAX offers a line retrieve per crank of 95 centimeter / 37.4 inch, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X stands out for a weight of 175g / 6,17oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tiagra and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
