Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
85.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.5:1 / 1.3:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight3265g / 115.17oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €779.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80WA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tiagra 80WAX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tiagra 80WAX offers a line retrieve per crank of 95 centimeter / 37.4 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX stands out for a weight of 175g / 6,17oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tiagra and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
