Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Torium
Multireels
64.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.8 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight600g / 21.16oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3 S-ARB + 1RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €168.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size16HGAL
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €61.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX offers a durability of 8.56 out of 10, while Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.3:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Torium and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT?
Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X
