Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Torium
Multireels
64.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.57 out of 10
Ergonomics5.8 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight600g / 21.16oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3 S-ARB + 1RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €173.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20HGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
64.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €72.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX offers a durability of 8.57 out of 10, while Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Torium and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT?
Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
