Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Torium
Multireels
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight1000g / 35.27oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3 S-ARB + 1RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €184.30
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30HGAL
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX clearly outshines Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.8:1) and line retrieve per crank (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch). While Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Torium and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
