Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Torium
Multireels
83.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag14kg / 30.86lbs
Weight790g / 27.87oz
Line retireve per crank116 centimeter / 45.67 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €279.90
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40HGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.6/429

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX offers a ball bearings of 4, while Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Torium and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- Rated 8.34 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
