Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in total score (7.69 out of 10) and durability (5.55 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX
