Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/200
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X, offering significantly better performance in total score (7.69 out of 10) and durability (5.55 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
