Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT
Feeder And Match
3000-c (match)x
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.98 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05 lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €49.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C (Match)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X edges out Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.55 out of 10) and the total score (7.69 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05 lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX
