Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X edges out Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X holds its own with strengths like a ergonomics of 6.37 out of 10 and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- With a line retrieve of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch (5.29 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X
