Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X edges out Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.1:1 and a weight of 190g / 6,7oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
