Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX edges out Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 190g / 6,7oz and a ergonomics of 6.37 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
