Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX edges out Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 190g / 6,7oz and a ergonomics of 6.37 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX
