Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX edges out Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch). Still, Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 190g / 6,7oz and a ergonomics of 6.37 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX
