Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in weight (190g / 6,7oz) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.73 out of 10 (190g / 6,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Delphin INKS 5000X
