Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
