Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa BG 2000X
