Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in weight (190g / 6,7oz) and total score (7.69 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.73 out of 10 (190g / 6,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX
