Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R
Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170
Shimano Sahara 2500 R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.96 out of 10
Ergonomics4.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight275g / 9.70oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €47.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 R, offering significantly better performance in total score (7.69 out of 10) and durability (5.55 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Shimano Sahara 2500 R?
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Shimano Sahara 2500 R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R
Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX
Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX
Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X
Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX
Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX
Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX