Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170

Shimano Sahara 3000S R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics4.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight280g / 9.87oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 3000S R, offering significantly better performance in total score (7.69 out of 10) and durability (5.55 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 3000S R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Shimano Sahara 3000S R?
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Shimano Sahara 3000S R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX
