Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
88.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €383.50
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and weight (215g / 7,58oz). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
