Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
88.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €383.50
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Delphin INKS 3000X
