Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
88.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €383.50
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X edges out Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch). Still, Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Shimano Ultegra?
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Stradic FM vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX
