Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
88.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €383.50
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and total score (8.86 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X
