Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x edges out Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.2:1) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX
