Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and durability (5.56 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI
