Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/200
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and durability (5.56 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX
