Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
84.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €299.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX edges out Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the gear ratio (4.9:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 275g / 9,7oz and a ergonomics of 6.08 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX
