Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X edges out Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.1:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch and a durability of 5.56 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X
