Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX edges out Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.1:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FD and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX
